Different kinds of footages were used to see the performance of Mac mini and it successfully processed all of them without having any issue.The 16in MacBook Pro is a good video-editing machine, and the one to get if you need to edit video on the move, but again, this is a Mac that is likely to get one of Apple's M-series processors soon.Importing huge video files is breezy with USB 3, SD card slot, SSD and Fusion Drive.A Mac would easily put you north of 1,000. This article will introduce 5 best 4K video editors for you to enhance your 4k video.This review is part of the overall Mac Mini (2012) review.Although there were some issues with 4K video editing in Mac Mini 2018 and that’s only when a user renders a 4K video in the background, but this has been improved a lot in the new M1 Mac Mini. There are many free or paid video editing software in the market, but not every one supports editing 4K videos. This could be limiting for intensive image/video editing right now, and is very likely to become an issue in the future as image and video resolutions invariably rise, especially as you can't. The only reason we don't rate it as the number 1 iMac for image or video editing is, like it's M1 MacBook cousins, you can't spec more than 16GB or RAM.Apple Mac mini (M1, 2020) Welcome to our pick of the best computers for video editing in 2021. Microsoft Surface Studio 2. And that would cost you a cool 1,500 or more.Fusion Drive is helps save time during file importing but after that it doesn't really impact the performance during video editing.Apple iMac (27-inch, 2020) 3. The MacBook Pro is the Apple equivalent of a high-end PC. Even these cost around 1,000. You would need a high-end PC to get the processing power video editing requires.There's no difference when choosing to edit video off either USB 3 and Firewire 800. Scrubbing 1080P videos through the timeline updates the viewer instantly.I've also tried editing with the original video files on USB 3 and Firewire 800 external drives ( Western Digital My Passport 5400RPM) and there's no lag or stutter while skimming. Both are snappy on the Mac Mini.Impressive! And at less than half the price.And Final Cut Pro X is about two times faster than iMovie. The only time I feel the fans speeding up is while Final Cut is encoding.Just for comparison against my old Mac Pro quad 3Ghz, I downloaded these two videos below, imported and then exported them using Final Cut Pro X.Chinatown Mid Autumn Festival Sketchwalk (2m15s video at 1920 by 1080, 25fps):Kampong Glam Sketchwalk (2m16s video at 1280 by 720, 25fps):The 2012 Mac Mini is almost twice as fast as the 2006 Mac Pro when it comes to rendering videos. For example, iMovie doesn't maximize the use of all cores while rendering video.Final Cut Pro X makes use of multi-core when exporting so it's faster than iMovie.
Mini For Video Editing Free Or PaidIssuesBut importing huge files, I mean importing more than 4GB of files. You'll want to check out barefeats.com tests that compare this Mac Mini to the iMac with a dedicated GPU. Final Cut's usage of processing power really varies, and I don't know according to what criteria.Using other applications while rendering affects the overall export time.When it comes to running effects on Final Cut Pro X, things get slower. Even Final Cut Pro X does not use all 4 cores. Google asstiatn for mac bookIt still can be done though, slowly. Scrubbing the video isn't that responsive but it's not surprising given that 4K video is really data-heavy. OSX will take its time to readjust the Fusion partition for best use of the SSD and slow hard drive, and during this period of time, even copying files to USB3 drives are limited by the hard drive speed.Editing 4K video is quite a challenge. The drive can always save and write files faster than what your processor can render out.Here are my rough disk speed tests you can use for reference:I am using a MB Pro 2.2GHZ i7 quadcore 16GB RAM Snow Leopard, and a 750GB Momentus Hybrid as my main drive but installed an OWC 120GB SSD with Diskdoubler (removed DVD bay) and Mtn Lion to run some newer apps. Internal drive if often faster than USB3 or FW800.If you go up to 1080p at 50 or 60fps, then it might be worth considering Thunderbolt.When you're exporting, the bottleneck is from the processor. But what I can say is it's definitely powerful enough for general purpose video editing, such as videos for events, friends' you're fine with FW800, then there's probably no need to upgrade to the Thunderbolt (which is quite expensive currently).A lot will depend on how large your RAW video files are.I'm working on mainly 1080i25fps, 1080p24fps, 720p25fps and FW800 handles them well enough.The best would be to have the working video files on your internal drive, and then backup them to external when you don't need them anymore. Overall recommendationI can't confirm whether the Mac Mini is good enough for professional video editing because I don't have cameras that shot at 1080P at 50FPS or 60FPS. That option is not available when exporting. But FW800 and USB 3.0 (for the MB Air) is good enough for now so I will wait for more price drops.BTW your S'pore videos look great, very clear and nice vivid color. There are also LaCie Little Big Disk refurbs available for around $225.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKipp ArchivesCategories |